|
Article Index
What is wrong with Thumping the Bible?
Drones for our protection. For those who will believe anything!
Southern Independence: Antidote to Tyranny
Is the Constitution Really Inimical To States Rights? - Part Thirteen
2013 Robert E. Lee Celebration and March
Fiscal Cliff Bill - Lies, Socialism and USS Titanic
Psalm 2 Government - Obamanation vs. Christianty
Is the Constitution Really Inimical To States Rights? - Part Twelve
Psalm 2 Government - Obamanation vs. Hobby Lobby
Maryland State Song Correct - Abraham Lincoln A Despot and A Tyrant
The Despotism of Lincoln Conceded by Northern Authority
Why do totalitarians like Lincoln?
Lincoln the racist
Is the Constitution Really Inimical To States Rights? - Part Eleven
Misteaching of history about Lincoln
How to get off the sinking U.S.S. Titanic - Part 4
Announcing The Fifth Southern National Congress
More about false history and mythology on Lincoln
New Movie Propagates Lincoln Historical Myths
Senate to vote on the Federal Land Seizure Act on Thursday
|
Senate Repeals D.C.
Gun Ban By Large Vote
-- But the fight in the House is just
beginning
Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org
Monday, March 2, 2009
By a
resounding vote of 62 to 36 last week, the U.S. Senate has approved
an amendment, offered by Senator John Ensign of Nevada, to repeal
the D.C. gun ban.
Congratulations!
But the battle is not over.
This week, the House will take up the D.C.
voting legislation. And anti-gun Speaker Nancy Pelosi is angling to
impose a "gag rule" on the House, so that D.C. gets its
unconstitutional representative, while continuing its draconian
anti-gun laws (like microstamping).
So here's the deal: The House will be asked to
consider a "rule" which establishes the time for debate and provides
for which amendments may be considered -- and which may not.
It is expected that the Pelosi rule will seek
to deny the House any vote on the D.C. gun ban and thereby strip the
repeal of the ban from the House bill.
So what we are asking you to do is to write
and/or call your congressman and demand that he oppose any rule that
strips the D.C. gun ban repeal from the D.C. voting bill.
Just to remind you of how draconian the D.C.
gun law is:
* Following the Supreme Court's decision in
Heller declaring the law to be unconstitutional, D.C. made a few
cosmetic changes which will, as a practical matter, allow it to
continue to deny its citizens the right to keep and bear arms.
* Then, the City Council passed a whole
series of new anti-gun measures. These include a requirement that
most guns used for self-defense "microstamp" fired casings in two
places with a "unique serial number."
Aside from being ineffectual with respect to
stolen guns or crimes where the brass has not been left behind, this
microstamping provision is intended to make guns so expensive that
they won't be available anywhere -- including your state.
ACTION: Write your Representative and urge him
or her in the strongest terms to oppose any rule which will strip
the gun ban repeal from the D.C. voting bill.
You can go to the Gun Owners Legislative
Action Center at
http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm
to send your Representative the pre-written e-mail message below.
You can also call him or her toll-free at
1-877-762-8762.
----- Prewritten Letter -----
Dear Representative:
This week, when the House takes up the D.C.
voting legislation, please vote against any rule that strips the
Senate's pro-gun language and/or imposes a "gag rule" on members
of the House.
Just to remind you of how virulently
anti-gun the D.C. gun law is: Following the Supreme Court's
decision in Heller declaring the law to be unconstitutional, D.C.
made a few cosmetic changes which will, as a practical matter,
allow it to continue to deny its citizens the right to keep and
bear arms.
But, in addition, the City Council passed a
whole series of new anti-gun measures. These include a requirement
that most guns used for self-defense "microstamp" fired casings in
two places with a "unique serial number."
Aside from being ineffectual with respect to
stolen guns or crimes where the brass has not been left behind,
this microstamping provision is intended to make guns so expensive
that they won't be available anywhere -- including my state.
I urge you, in the strongest terms, to
oppose any rule that makes it impossible for you to vote on the
D.C. gun ban repeal.
Sincerely,
eMail this Page
|
|