effects of immigration

Information about the Effects of Immigration, Outsourcing and Expensive Trade Agreements on Georgia


Article Index

MYTH: Easter is derived from false pagan goddess

What Is A Christian Nation

Biblical References in Give Me Liberty Speech by Patrick Henry

HISTORICAL RECORD: Winter Months Grazing for Sheep in Bethlehem area

Fox News December 24, 2013: Too cold for shepherds in December

The Real Lincoln - Despot

Is the Constitution Really Inimical To States Rights? - Part Fourteen

MYTH: Too cold for shepherds to Tend Flocks in December - Part 2

Gun Control Coming to the Senate Floor on Monday

74th Anniversary of 'Gone with the Wind' premiere

Now Democrats jump on Expensive Trade Agreements - Hypocrites?
by MikeCrane

During the last few years of the Bush Administration and Republican control of Congress, Democrats for the most part have been opposed to so called free trade agreements. They said it cost American jobs, was bad for the economy and a sell out to multi-national corporations.

Well they were of course right!

Geeze even Cynthia McKinney voted against CAFTA while all but one of Georgia's Republican Congressmen and Senators puckered up for special interests and voted for CAFTA (See: Georgia Congressional delegation vote summary on trade agreements ).

But something smelled fishy about this Democratic position - because it was under the Clinton Administration that NAFTA was passed which started the

"giant sucking sound of American jobs"

as Ross Perot termed the pending job loss. In addition it started the massive growth of the Trade deficit as our country's international trade position has rapidly and steadily declined (See: Trade Deficit, continues to be example of failed economic polices ).

So we were hopeful, but very skeptical about a Democratic controlled Congress and US Senate putting a stop to this needless damage to our country's future.

It is not a major surprise to see the Democrats now flip flopping - as they are now supporting more Expensive Trade Agreements, just as they did during the Clinton Administration. Special interest money can rapidly adjust to shifts between the two factions of the Special Interest party.

Free Trade Agreements

So now the Democrats are going to support sending jobs to Peru and they have four other countries lined up according to reports coming from the government Trade department.

George Wallace was pretty close to being correct when he said,

"There is not a dimes worth of difference!"

And in the intervening years a dime is not worth as much as it used to be!

Your grandchildren's future is being sold on the auction block of corporate influence and campaign contributions at about the same speed regardless of which faction (Republican or Democratic) of the Special Interest party is in power.

As long as they keep getting sent back, anyone who believes that much will change has a problem with their elevator stopping at all floors.

eMail this Page

Support Voiced for US-Peru Trade Deal

WASHINGTON (AP) � Congress moved a step closer Tuesday to making Peru the first country to join in a free trade agreement with the U.S. since Democrats took over Congress at the beginning of the year.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., at a hearing of his committee, hailed the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement as the first to include "meaningful, and fully enforceable, labor and environmental standards."

Farming and manufacturing representatives also praised the agreement, and the AFL-CIO's chief international economist, while not endorsing the deal, said it was an improvement over past trade agreements.

The United States currently buys about $5.9 billion worth of Peruvian products a year, and sells about $2.9 billion worth in Peru. When the agreement is implemented, about 80 percent of U.S. consumer and industrial products and two-thirds of farm exports would immediately enter Peru duty-free.

A majority of Democrats and their key labor and environmental group allies have long been wary of free trade deals, saying they lead to the flight of U.S. jobs abroad, exploitation of foreign workers and depravation of foreign environments.

But the equation changed last May when House Democrats, led by Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., negotiated a deal with the administration guaranteeing that labor rights and the environment would be core elements in future trade accords.

Baucus said that as a result, Peruvian workers would be assured the right to organize and bargain collectively and Peruvian children would stay in school rather than work in sweatshops.

Thea Mei Lee, the AFL-CIO economist, said that while the agreement does not address all its worker rights' concerns, it was "an enormous improvement" over past Bush administration agreements with Chile, Singapore, Morocco and others.

She said that AFL-CIO unions were on both sides on the Peru agreement, and it was putting its priorities into opposing two other pending free trade agreements, with Colombia and South Korea.

Senate Democratic leaders have indicated that the Peru agreement could reach the Senate floor by mid to late October. Another agreement with Panama could be dealt with this year as well, while the Colombia and South Korea deals are more problematic � Colombia because of human rights issues and South Korea because of its restrictions on U.S. auto and other imports.

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, top Republican on the Finance Committee, cited estimates that the Peru agreement would result in a 25 percent boost in U.S. exports and 8 percent growth in Peruvian exports.

David Winkles, member of the American Farm Bureau Federation trade advisory committee, told the panel that U.S. agriculture exports to Peru, currently around $223 million a year, could jump by more than $700 million.

But Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, said in an interview that it would also "displace millions of peasant farmers in Peru." She said many labor and environmental groups with ties to Democrats are "basically infuriated that Democrats are going to consider passing more Bush NAFTA deals," referring to the North American Free Trade Agreement. "They are putting a new roof on a condemned building."

Several at the hearing, including Lee and former Clinton administration trade chief Mickey Kantor, stressed that Americans will only support free trade if there is clear evidence that the administration is enforcing promised labor and environmental standards.

"What we have right now are the right words on paper," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich. "That's not enough."

Source: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gyDWBd9Ehk-vQewqpJmEPc5LSXUQ



Print This Page


Southern Party of Georgia
725 Ridgeview Road
Morganton Georgia 30560

Email This page

How To Stay Informed


  More Information on Immigration, outsourcing and Free Trade

There are currently 16 citizens logged into the Southern Party of Georgia web site. Help spread the word and there will be more. Political correctness run amok will not end until we stop it.

Spread the word, recommend this page to a friend

Previous    Home    Next

To receive automatic notification when new articles are posted, click here

Email the Southern Party of Georgia

This page sponsored by: