A Southern Party of Georgia Position on
solving our country’s Trade Deficit
In a series of articles over the last year we have demonstrated
to the best of our ability the magnitude of this problem. In many
ways this is the ultimate test of the economic policies being
implemented by our elected and appointed officials. It demonstrates
very clearly how our country fares in international trade.
The numbers are conclusive. Our country is failing and has a
steadily deteriorating international trade position.
In this article we are submitting what we consider to be
viable proposals that would turn the steady deterioration around
into a position that is steadily improving. It is not an over night
fix, there is not an over night fix to this problem. But every year
that our country continues the failed policies will only increase
the recovery period.
We propose implementing two simple policy changes. BOTH
promote free trade – in the absence of foreign country and/or
corporate generated unfair trade practices. NEITHER place
unconstitutional restrictions on those engaged in international
trade.
1. Our current policies called
"Free Trade" have proven to be anything but Free. Foreign countries
and many American corporations are abusing the policy to the
detriment of Americans. We propose "FAIR" Trade.
The stated goal of the free traders has been that a
level trading field would spur economic activity, thus allowing
American talents to excel and improve. In reality this has NOT
created a level playing field. Instead it has created an
environment where American production of goods and services by
Americans is at a disadvantage.
Many American corporations have discarded concern for
Americans in search of lower labor costs, lower standards, lower
environmental concerns and lowered health risks. Foreign
governments and corporate management can easily manipulate the
system by creating trade advantages to their benefit and do so
regularly.
What we propose is to take the free traders at their word –
the goal is to establish a level trading field. This means that
trade with a foreign nation is roughly balanced as far as exports
and imports are concerned. We believe a viable solution is very
simple and is comprised of three simple points implemented on an
annual basis:
- Establish a fair trade threshold. We
suggest 100 Million Dollars. If imports vs. exports are within
this threshold, the current trade policy with that country is
considered to be fair and equitable and the current status would
be maintained.
- If the imports exceed exports to a
foreign country by more than the threshold then it is a sign
that there is a trade policy imbalance. The import tariff base
on all products and services will be raised by 2%. It does not
matter what is causing the imbalance, if it is a major imbalance
within a few years the imbalance will be removed by the
increased tariff base. Note this tariff applies to all products
and services from the foreign nation so there will be internal
pressure to implement fair trade policies and discontinue
specific product or service subsidies.
- If exports exceed imports to a foreign
country exceed the threshold then it is a sign we have a trade
imbalance in our favor. The tariff base for that country will be
reduced by 1%, unless it is already at 0%. This will be an
incentive for fair trade.
These three simple steps if applied on an annual basis would
have the effect of improving our international trade position at a
steady rate - without entering a period of isolationism or other
disruptive actions. Foreign countries and American corporations
would be faced with a direct incentive to work toward equitable
policies rather than face steadily increasing tariffs and loss of
their investment. Effects of lower standards, lower salaries, and
other foreign unfair economic advantages would steadily disappear.
2. Many American corporations
unfair trade advantages to the detriment of American citizens:
To provide our multinational corporations an economic
incentive to remember their roots from which they sprung, we
propose this same technique be allied in the form of a surtax on
foreign investment and
foreign profits computed on an annual
basis.
- Establish a fair trade threshold. We
suggest 100 Million Dollars. If imports vs. exports are within
this threshold, the current trade policy with that country is
considered to be fair and equitable and would be maintained.
- If the imports exceed exports to a
foreign country by more than the threshold then it is a sign
that there is a trade policy imbalance and the tax surcharge for
that foreign nation will be increased by 5%. American
corporations that want to invest or are participating in the
trade imbalance should be responsible for the effect on our
economy. If they insist on exercising their right to participate
- let them provide revenue in the form of the surtax to pay for
a portion of the damage to American society.
- If exports exceed imports to a foreign
country by more than the threshold then it is a sign we have a
trade imbalance in our favor. The corporate surtax for that
country will be reduced by 2 1/2%, unless it is already at 0%.
American corporations that have no regard for America or its
citizens will face loss of their foreign investment within 20
years; ie. surcharge reaches 100%. In a much shorter timeframe
investments in foreign countries which practice unfair trade will
have a declining profit status. Thus American corporations driven
by greed and dependence on unfair trade will have to change their
ways.
Long Term
Effect
The long term effect of these two simple
policies will be three fold:
- Over the course of a few years trade
imbalances will begin to disappear. Foreign countries that insist
on policies that would result in unfair trade advantages will be
restrained by the increased tariffs and will become less of a
factor each year. Today these countries are given a free ride at
the expense of American workers and our future generations and use
the ill gained funds to increase their unfair trade advantages.
- Corporate greed will be diminished. The
potential for both increased tariffs and surcharges will increase
the risk of investing in foreign nations which practice unfair
trade and will minimize the risk of investing here in our own
country. Today these corporations are given a free ride at the
expense of American workers and our future generations.
- Those foreign nations and American
corporation that insist on exercising their rights to participate
in unfair trade advantages will provide some direct revenue which
can be used to offset the cost of their unfair trade practices on
the American economy and our citizens - and become less
competitive at the same time.
Where these policies conflict with any
existing treaty, such as NAFTA, the treaty should be repealed.
We welcome your comments at
fair_trade@spofga.org.
Some Reference Articles:
If you found this position statement of interest, the
following may be also:
Many
ask, “Why a Southern Party …?”
|