Taxes and the Economy

Information about Taxes, Government Spending and the Economy 

 

Article Index

Login

Vote Coming to Confirm Anti-gun Radical

SNC - Statement on Second Amendment

2009 Georgia LS Summer Institute

Let’s Not Forget Memorial Day

What has happened to our country?

Remembering the Great Locomotive Chase

Confederate Memorial Service Saturday 4 April 2009.

Confederate Heritage Month - Minutes

April is also Confederate History Month

Land grab bill coming back, again

Georgia Legislature dips into your wallet again!

Georgia League of South Annual State meeting - March 14

Revenue Neutral??? - For those who will believe anything!

Effect of illegal immigration - breakdown of political system

Senate Repeals D.C. Gun Ban By Large Vote

Southern National Congress Denounces “False Stimulus” Bill

Truth concerning the Confederate Battle Flag - Sermon by Pastor John Weaver

Anti-gun Land Bill On The Move

SLRC argues Burleson case in Federal Appeals Court

ALABAMA SECESSION DAY/CONSTITUTION MINI-SEMINAR

Bush Administration takes another step toward globalization ...
By Mike Crane

Just in time to let President Bush's national speech on immigration and amnesty drown it out, our country's "strong dollar" policy has been replaced by a "weak dollar" policy.

Now many will ask, "what the blazes does that mean?"

What it means is very simple, our failed economic polices have failed to such an extent that our government is officially admitting it. But instead of changing the failed economic polices they are going to continue them, and use political "double speak" in an effort to mislead the citizens.

We have been sold these failed polices under the guise of "Americans want cheap imports." Hence the great growth of companies such as Wal-Mart, once a solidly made in USA company. With economic policies that favored corporate greed, American companies, one after another, moved their facilities to foreign countries.

While we were being told this is good for us, American jobs by the millions have moved to foreign countries AND the products and services that they used to produce. To give the illusion that our economy is still improving employment has moved to government which is by the far the largest employer in our country today. This has resulted in massive amounts of debt, both the world's greatest budget deficits and the world's greatest trade deficits.

Now that entire industries have moved to foreign countries, our government is saying:

  • That you need to pay more for the cheap imports that you have traded for the millions of jobs.
  • But you do not get the jobs back, instead you will get to pay the debt AND pay more the cheap imports.

This is just another small step toward globalization which is sacrificing the future of your grandchildren:

Globalization: The Politicians pitch: Free Market forces will eventually solve the problem. Rising incomes in foreign countries will stabilize the situation.

Explanation:  Using some round representative numbers (references at bottom):

US population 300 Million, Average per capita income - $33,000 per year

India population 1 Billion, average per capita income - $472.00 per year.

Equalized income between US and India - $7,978.00 per year.

What that means to you: Average American income will fall dramatically.

If we achieve globalization - if the current economic policies are maintained the American average per capita income will have to fall to $7,978.00 per year - for the per capita income in India and the US to equalize.

Effect on your grandchildren: You are condemning your future generations to live on the equivalent of roughly $8,000.00 current dollars.

Note: After publishing this material I received a phone call from a professor in Alabama who raised a valid objection. He stated that these figures are not correct as they represent complete 100% "globalization" which can not occur. He is of course correct so to be more precise we will restate the above more correctly:

If we achieve globalization - if the current economic policies are maintained the American average per capita income will have to fall to $7,978.00 per year plus or minus roughly $1,000.00 - for the per capita income in India and the US to equalize.

The failed economic policies are the result of an age old struggle, one that our Founding Fathers warned us about:

"The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite."

- Thomas Jefferson

Both political parties have become embedded with special interests and no longer represent you - the citizens. As long as you continue to send the same folks back to elected office you are going to get nothing but more of the same! If you - the citizens - do not change something - what makes you think anything will change?

George Washington, also warned us, and maybe it is time to give his warning some consideration:

From President George Washington's Farewell Address:

20 I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the state, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party, generally.

21 This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

22 The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.

23 Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind, (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight,) the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

24 It serves always to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration. It agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

Perhaps it is time to end the two party monopoly, and allow real political competition for the first time in almost 100 years. But that is up to you - citizens.

Back to our latest step toward globalization, the following article contains admissions from the Bush Administration that they are abandoning a "strong dollar" policy. Devaluing the dollar is one small step toward reducing the standard of living in our country in relation to the rest of the world.

Email This page

U.S., Seeking Smaller Deficit, Signals Comfort With Dollar Drop

May 15 (Bloomberg) -- The Bush administration, seeking to narrow its near record trade deficit, is signaling comfort with the dollar's 6.6 percent decline this year.

Treasury Secretary John Snow's calls for stronger Asian currencies and the need to reduce global trade imbalances have convinced some investors and currency strategists he won't stand in the way of a weaker U.S. currency. By not protesting the dollar's slide, the Treasury Department is giving traders a green light to push it lower.

``The way they look at it, they are more than happy to tolerate market forces,'' said Steven Saywell, chief currency strategist at Citigroup Inc. in London. ``It's extremely unlikely you are going to see strong policy rhetoric from the U.S.'' to stem the dollar's retreat.

A weaker currency would increase the attractiveness of American exports, which rose to a record $114.7 billion in March, according to a Commerce Department report on May 12. The increase in sales of manufactured goods helped narrow the trade shortfall to $62 billion, still the seventh largest ever. The gap widened to an all-time high of $726 billion last year.

The New York Board of Trade's Dollar Index, which measures the dollar against the currencies of six trading partners, including the euro, yen and British pound, has lost 6.6 percent this year. The dollar is down 8.3 percent versus the euro and 6.5 percent against the yen.

Let Markets Rule

In repeatedly stating a preference for markets to set exchange rates, President George W. Bush's economic team is suggesting it's reconciled to a weaker dollar, said a former White House economic aide.

``No one in the administration is going to try to talk the dollar up or down,'' said Phillip Swagel, a former chief of staff to Bush's Council of Economic Advisers and now an economist at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. ``They want a market-determined dollar, and they are satisfied that will mean a weaker dollar. They aren't trying to give it a shove.''

The dollar's decline has accelerated since Group of Seven finance ministers called on April 21 for some Asian countries to let their currencies appreciate. The statement was the first explicit call for stronger Asian currencies by the group, which had previously sought greater flexibility.

G-7 Turning Point

The G-7 described ``global imbalances,'' reflected in the $805 billion U.S. current-account deficit and China's surplus as a risk to the global economic expansion. The current account is a measure of overseas trade, services, tourism and investments.

``It dates back to the G-7 meeting,'' said Robert Sinche, head of global currency strategy at Bank of America Corp. in New York. ``It appears there is a tacit agreement among the G-7 that a modest depreciation now is preferable to a rapid one later.''

Snow told reporters in Washington on May 10 he favors a ``strong'' dollar with its value is set by markets, language he's repeated since succeeding Paul O'Neill as Treasury Secretary in 2003. Bush's administration sees a weaker dollar and faster economic growth aboard as a way to shrink the trade deficit, the Wall Street Journal reported on May 13, citing people familiar with their thinking.

Tony Fratto, Treasury's chief spokesman, declined to comment on the report, referring instead to Snow's May 10 statement.

Adams's Message

At the same time, Treasury Undersecretary for International Affairs Tim Adams has been warning Japanese authorities not to stand in the way of the yen's advance against the dollar since the G-7 meeting.

``We should let the market set the value and should all refrain not only from intervening but also from commenting on exchange rates,'' Adams told reporters in Hyderabad, India, on May 4. ``The less said, the better.''

Japanese officials, including Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki, have said they are ready to act as needed to prevent excessive swings in exchange rates. Japan hasn't sold currency since March 2004.

``Put together the pieces,'' said Bank of America's Sinche. ``The administration is much less supportive of a strong dollar policy.''

The global economic environment may be more suited to a weaker dollar this year than in 2005, when successive Federal Reserve interest rate increases and looser monetary policy in Japan and Europe pushed the dollar up 14.7 percent against the yen and 14.4 percent versus the euro. It was the dollar's first annual advance since 2001.

Central Banks' Role

This year, the European Central Bank has raised interest rates and signaled further tightening in response to higher oil prices and a rebound in growth. The Bank of Japan has reduced the amount of money it pumps into the banking industry and may lift its benchmark rate from near zero as soon as June, economists surveyed by Bloomberg predicted last month.

The Federal Reserve, which lifted its target rate at every policy meeting since June 2004, said last week it's now deciding rate moves on the basis of economic data. Chairman Ben S. Bernanke told Congress last month the bank may take a breather.

The shift in Fed policy has more to do with the dollar's decline than any perceived change in Treasury's stance, said Swagel at the American Enterprise Institute.

The U.S.'s stated preference for a strong dollar, which has never included support for a specified exchange rate, reached its heyday under Robert Rubin, who was President Bill Clinton's Treasury Secretary from 1995 to 1999.

Rubin and his successor, Lawrence Summers, said a strong dollar is in the best interests of the U.S. because it tempered inflation and interest rates. Bush, O'Neill and Snow added a nuance: that currency values are best set in the market, leading some investors to question their commitment to the policy.

Veering From Script

Snow has occasionally deviated from even that watered-down script, pushing the dollar lower. On May 11, 2003, Snow said a weaker dollar would help exports. Less than a week later, he told reporters at a G-7 meeting in Deauville, France, that declines in the dollar during the previous year were ``fairly modest.'' The U.S. currency fell after each remark.

At meetings in Dubai in September that year, Snow convinced G-7 officials to call for ``more flexibility in exchange rates'' in major countries, which was interpreted as a call for a weaker dollar. The U.S. currency lost 8 percent against the euro in the following three months and weakened 4 percent versus the yen.

``The U.S. has abandoned a strong dollar in everything but words,'' said Marc Chandler, a currency strategist at Brown Brothers Harriman in New York. ``The market has seen through the veneer.''

To contact the reporters on this story:
Kevin Carmichael in Washington at  kcarmichael@bloomberg.net

Source: http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000006&sid=aOZVD0xr9eSM&refer=home#

About the author: Mike Crane is a vice chairman of the Southern Party of Georgia and a candidate for the 51st Senate District. He is an outspoken critic of the influence of special interests on our government at all levels. His campaign web site is at: http://ElectMikeCrane.com

How you can help the Southern Party in our efforts to provide more political competition, click here.

Print This Page

Contribute

Southern Party of Georgia
725 Ridgeview Road
Morganton Georgia 30560
http://www.spofga.org

Email This page

How To Stay Informed

 
 

 More Information On Taxes and Government Spending;

Spread the word, recommend this page to a friend

Previous    Home    Next

Print This Page

To receive automatic notification when new articles are posted, click here

Email the Southern Party of Georgia

This page sponsored by:

TOS-InternetSiteBuilder - Business websites - no webmaster needed - $75.00 per year



 

Buy Southern! 
Support Southern Businesses that support Our Georgia State Flag.